Is helping Ukraine worth risking WW3?
Last Updated: 02.07.2025 16:38
Russia can stop this any time.
Letting Ukraine fire ATACMS at Russian air bases is patently conclusively unequivocally WW3.
Sending weapons to Ukraine is certainly WW3.
Sending F16s to Ukraine is WW3.
Ukraine refusing to surrender to Russia in February 2022 is WW3.
All they have to do is to withdraw their troops.
Why is it difficult to get a job?
“It’s going to be WW3!” is the most notorious notion used by fear-mongers for years.
Just in the last 5 years:
Please kindly ask Mr Putin to avoid the WW3.
Common Antibiotic Found To Tame Blood Pressure in Surprising New Role - SciTechDaily
Letting Ukraine strike Russia with their home-made weapons is WW3.
Letting Ukraine strike targets in Crimea is WW3.
Ukraine’s incursion into Russia is undeniably WW3.
Why do people still think Michael Jackson was guilty?
Sending HIMARS is surely WW3.
Thank you.
Trump approving to kill Soleimani is WW3.
Ukraine getting Javelins is WW3.
What’s next?
Ukraine kicking Russia out of Ukraine is WW3?
Who are the IT boys of the 1st, 2nd, 3rd, and 4th generation in K-pop?
Sending ATACMS is WW3.
Sending MANPADS/ATGMs to Ukraine is undoubtedly WW3.
Ukraine’s getting invitation to NATO is WW3?
Ukrainians are so tired of hearing all this nonsense.
Supplying Ukraine with Tomahawks is WW3? Stationing western troops in Odesa is WW3?
Sending Stormshadow/Scalp missiles is WW3.
Do most narcissists have good intentions as long as you are under their control?
Sending Abrams tanks is absolutely WW3.
Let’s just make it real clear:
Any day of the week — including Sundays.